Thats an interesting finding Sj, and one that re-enforces my perspective on Tilt / Stars. Can not answer specifically for the token games but do have a couple of thoughts... one specific and one general.

The specific came from a recent PxF video where the instructor pulled up some datamined stats on a 50c / $1 table at Full Tilt (this was a banned program, but that is another story).... every single opponent with data (7 out of 8) was a winner and tagged as either a shark or a rock. Apparently this is often the case, especially with the multi-tabling rocks who squeeze out a few BBs / hour on many tables... at a 50c / $1 table - to me that is very scarty (!)

More generally, think about your average small-stakes pro grinder. Where do they play?

The vast majority are at Stars or Full Tilt right? .... enough liquidlity at the tables to keep several games going, big and regular enough tournaments. Whether an individual is good enough to beat them at whatever level then I really think people should be asking themselves a simple question:

Why play against tables full of winning players when there are alternative sites with far more fish!??!?

Answers on a postcard to...

(or just post them here!)

Cheers, Mark